Saturday, August 2, 2008

In my point of view I am against in Anti-Life and Anti-Family advocates. In the present situation it is seen that even we have small population, still the income per person is small, compared to the densely populated areas the economic growth is very high and income per person is even higher.

Another fact is that the effect of curving down the population will be felt after 15-20 yrs or so, when there is scarcity in human resources. More over the promotion of artificial birth control would only lead to infanticides,murder,contraception,homo sexuality, so it is not advisable especially to the young ones like us to adopt this practice in the near future.

So much so that the catholic church is against the use of artificial birth control, I'd rather have to abide by it.

-jessa cid-

1 comment:

lapuz regine (F) said...

Having a big population is not a big problem.its better to have a big population than many child abortion and it is not good to make a policy about our population growth because if we make a policy about population.How about those prignant women,they will be force to abord for the sake of our population growth.According to maltus,populationcontrol is simply not the solution to poverty.If we have a big population we have a many laborers in our countrthis maltus proposal can help our economic growth and it can control our sexual education andchild abortion.Im not agree that we are poor because we are so many maybe it will not manage well.